Kim and Donald - Military or Diplomatic Invasion! North Korea NEOCON program!
Again, once I told about the possibility of invasion of USA in North Korea. I don't know the sumary of the meeting between Trump and Kim in Cingapore, but I know that, diplomaticaly, USA can have their goals achieved after this meeting.
North Korea is one of the biggest producers of minerals for mass destruction weapons and energy generators, that can feed the USA capability for centuries. After this meeting, USA can explore the resources of North Korea in charge of benefits into international scenario.
The relations with China, the next biggest player - still after Russia - will be better, mining Russia geopoliticaly. The expectations of Russia after this meeting is how North Korea can accept the demands of USA and international bankers and businessmen.
USA will invade the North Korea, by diplomatic ways or by military ways, or by the PNAC military diplimacy, that will advance through Chinese territory.
The implementation of Chinese Warfare is a strategy of Globalist government that would like to implement the World Bank in Chine and siege the Russian influence.
Well...
North Korea maneouver of a peaceful meeting with South Korea gave a break on this advance.
Also the denial on ending the nuclear program is a inteligent strategy, because every country must have his defense, and North Korea must have hers and the denuclearization woult put North Korea in the inferior position to negociate and the opening to the mineral extraction.
Ghadafi happened to disarm before the invasion, Iraq was invaded without defense also. Iran is the new eightball together North Korea, but both countries are in close relations with others, like Turkey, Russia and China.
The use of Phony Wars and Proxy Wars is a constant strategy on USA and China, using North Korea.
Since Indochina war, Kissinger had the interest on the region to make influence and siege the Asia, with the influence of Japan as alied and Hong Kong to have a lot of influence in China. Nowadays, the World Bank are interested on environment of the region, and the cheap producers for the large scale productions of manufactures and technologic stuff to sell back to America by cheap prices and overtax the products.
The dialectics are involved in create an enemy, give the solution and make a synthesis, of destroy the enemy and control the population, implementing phony wars and fake news and give the democratic solution.
By NEOCON model or Institutional model, Trump has a big card in his pocket!
Both sizes has their demands, let's see who will play better!!
And North Korea can be invaded by warfare or peaceful conditions!
Check the links below to understand more and read the news and check the problems with the PNAC model of diplomatic front.
The really problem is that the model of negociation to North Korea remembers really Ghadaffi's Lybia and this really mess with the country.
The denuclearization of the country can make it an easy prey, just like the cancelation of the treaty with Iran by Trump, Iran was under control, but it's not normal to accept to open it's own defense, also when it have a problem with intern terrorism.
North Korea is not a model of country, is not a model of autonomy, but it remains under an order and this oder is stablished, not as a menace to world wide but to the Global Americanism and to the Global bankers.
Mike Pompeo says he could imagine US ground invasion of North Korea during nomination grilling
Donald Trump’s nomination for America’s top diplomat has said he could imagine the US launching a ground invasion of North Korea.
Mike Pompeo, proposed as the new secretary of state, said the US may at some point have to “move past diplomacy” to stop the regime’s nuclear programme.
However Mr Pompeo stressed he did not favour “regime change” and wanted to solve the world’s crises with diplomatic rather than military means.
During a grilling by a Senate committee, Mr Pompeo said he had been interviewed by the Russian election meddling investigation but declined to answer questions about what was discussed.
He said he would not quit if Robert Mueller, the special counsel leading the Russia investigation, was sacked by Mr Trump.
Mr Pompeo declined to say that Mr Trump should pull out of the Iran nuclear deal unilaterally and pledged to counter Russia’s attempts to undermine Western democracy.
He also promised to fill gaps in the State Department that have been left open since Mr Trump took office, warning that diplomats had become demoralised.
Kim Says He’d End North Korea Nuclear Pursuit for U.S. Truce
SEOUL, South Korea — Keeping diplomatic developments coming at a head-snapping pace, the South Korean government said on Sunday that North Korea’s leader, Kim Jong-un, had told President Moon Jae-in that he would abandon his nuclear weapons if the United States agreed to formally end the Korean War and promise not to invade his country.
In a confidence-building gesture ahead of a proposed summit meeting with President Trump, a suddenly loquacious and conciliatory Mr. Kim also said he would invite experts and journalists from South Korea and the United States to watch the shutdown next month of his country’s only known underground nuclear test site.
In Washington, Trump officials spoke cautiously about the chances of reaching a deal and laid out a plan for the dismantling of the North’s nuclear program, perhaps over a two-year period.
That would be accompanied by a “full, complete, total disclosure of everything related to their nuclear program with a full international verification,” said John R. Bolton, Mr. Trump’s new national security adviser.
After secret North and South Korea meeting, Trump says summit talks going 'well'
SEOUL, South Korea — South Korean President Moon Jae-in said on Sunday that Kim Jong Un expressed a firm commitment to complete denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula and that the North Korean leader still wants to meet with President Trump.
Meanwhile, Trump said Saturday night that talks on salvaging the summit meeting were "going along very well."
Moon briefed reporters on his surprise Saturday meeting with Kim, which took place at the Panmunjom border village inside the Demilitarized Zone that divides the Korean Peninsula.
The meeting came a month after the first inter-Korean summit between the two leaders. Moon said that the casual nature of their second meeting was “like a normal routine between friends.”
Moon said that he urged North Korea and the U.S. to directly communicate to avoid misunderstandings, and that Kim agreed.
Trump, speaking from the Oval Office while greeting an American freed from Venezuela, said "we’re doing very well in terms of the summit with North Korea," adding that “there are meetings going on as we speak."
On Thursday, Trump canceled a June 12 North Korea-U.S. summit that had been scheduled to be held in Singapore, citing the “tremendous anger and open hostility” of recent communications from Pyongyang. However, Trump has left the door open since, tweeting on Friday that Washington was having “very productive talks with North Korea” about reinstating the summit.
Moon told reporters that working-level talks between the U.S. and North Korea were going to happen soon and he that he was “looking forward to the June 12 meeting.”
"We agreed that the June 12 US-North Korea summit must be successful," Moon said of his meeting with Kim.
In a statement released before Moon’s briefing on Sunday, North Korean state news agency KCNA said that Kim Jong Un “expressed his fixed will” to hold the summit with the U.S.
Moon also said that he hoped to hold three-way talks with the U.S. and North Korea to discuss a formal peace treaty to end the Korean War, which ceased in 1953 with an armistice, after a successful Trump-Kim summit.
On Saturday, Trump complained on Twitter about a New York Times story that said administration officials disagreed on how to handle North Korea. The piece quoted an anonymous source saying it's too late to hold the meeting on June 12.
"WRONG AGAIN!" Trump tweeted.
John Bolton's Radical Views on North Korea
The president’s new national-security adviser doesn’t seem to think the current strategy is likely to work.
The Trump administration’s plan for dealing with North Korea’s nuclear-weapons program currently consists of two main components: an international campaign of economic sanctions and diplomatic pressure against the Kim regime, plus direct nuclear talks this spring between Donald Trump and Kim Jong Un. The president’s new national-security adviser, John Bolton, doesn’t seem to believe that either of these approaches is likely to work.
Bolton is instead one of the most prominent proponents of a radical idea, which some hardline U.S. officials in Congress and the White House have refused to rule out but have not recommended with Bolton-like conviction: striking North Korea now, and risking the most destructive war in living memory, to prevent it from threatening the United States with nuclear weapons later.
In February, when Trump announced the “strongest sanctions ... that we have ever put on a country,” on ships and shipping companies helping North Korea evade trade restrictions, Bolton dismissed the measures. Twenty-five years of “pressure and diplomacy” have “failed” to halt the North’s pursuit of nuclear weapons, the former George W. Bush administration official told Newsweek. Sanctions might have made a difference 15 years ago, before North Korea tested its first nuclear weapon, but they won’t today, he maintained.
One of the few remaining options was to “persuade China” to “remove the regime in North Korea” and permit the reunification of the Korean peninsula. This was characterized as a “diplomatic option.” But Bolton doubted the Chinese could be convinced to reverse their longstanding policy of resisting regime change in North Korea. The United States is thus fast approaching a “binary choice”: live with a North Korea capable of attacking America with nuclear weapons, which Bolton claimed was intolerable, or take military action to avert that outcome, which he suggested was tolerable if unpalatable.
In March, after Trump shocked the world by agreeing to discuss “denuclearization” with Kim Jong Un by May, Bolton went on Fox News to applaud the meeting—not because it could resolve the nuclear crisis peacefully, but because it could quickly expose Kim Jong Un as a con man. When Kim balks at Trump’s demands to immediately give up his whole nuclear-weapons program and ship it off to the U.S., Bolton reasoned, the North Korean leader’s true motivation will be revealed: buying time through protracted negotiations to perfect nuclear-tipped long-range missiles that can reach the United States.
Bolton set a towering bar for success at the summit: not just complete and instant denuclearization, which most experts consider unachievable, but also voluntary regime change: “If Kim Jong Un comes in and says, ‘You know, I’ve seen the error of my ways. I’m gonna renounce my leadership of North Korea and go live in a villa on the seashore of China for the rest of my life and the regime can get on without me,’ that would be historic, but unlikely,” he said. Bolton went on to tell a kind of joke: “Question: How do you know that the North Korean regime is lying? Answer: Their lips are moving.”
If sanctions and diplomacy won’t stop North Korea from developing a long-range nuclear capability, and if a nuclear-armed North Korea is unacceptable, then that leaves no carrots and only the biggest of sticks: military force. In recent weeks Bolton has noted that North Korea is thought to be only months away from being able to deliver nuclear warheads to the United States, and that the U.S. might not be able to deter the reckless Kim regime from either using those weapons against America or selling nuclear and missile technology to American enemies like Iran or even terrorist groups. As a result, he’s argued, “striking first” to eliminate the “imminent threat” from North Korea qualifies as “self-defense” and “is perfectly legitimate.”
Bolton, who previously proposed U.S. military action to prevent Iraq and Iran from wielding weapons of mass destruction, has described in detail what preventive strikes against North Korea could look like. In August he wrote that the United States could try to destroy any North Korea missile poised for launch at America; target North Korean nuclear and missile facilities, launch sites, and submarine bases with cyberattacks or bombing raids from the air and sea; or take out North Korea’s leadership with airstrikes or special-operations forces and then dispatch ground forces to seize North Korea’s capital, nuclear program, and military sites.
He acknowledged that North Korea could respond to any of these actions by retaliating against South Korea and Japan, and advised the U.S. military to do everything it could to minimize the blowback. (Experts estimate that thousands or even millions of people, including deployed U.S. troops and American expats, could die if conflict were to break out on the Korean peninsula.) But Bolton, a fierce nationalist who has ridiculed the South Koreans for being “like putty in North Korea’s hands” when it comes to the North’s diplomatic overtures, also wrote that while the United States “should obviously seek South Korea’s agreement (and Japan’s) before using force … no foreign government, even a close ally, can veto an action to protect Americans from Kim Jong Un’s nuclear weapons.”
Once ensconced in his West Wing office, Bolton could surprise everyone and become a convert to a North Korea policy of pressure and engagement. But Bolton’s firm belief in the purifying power of regime change, his confidence in the efficacy of war and distrust of measures short of war, suggest he’s more likely to steer the Trump administration in an even more hardline direction. And that doesn’t just apply to North Korea. Bolton has asserted that Iran “is nearly as imminent” a threat because the Obama administration’s 2015 nuclear deal has given the Iranians access to money to purchase nuclear hardware from North Korea. What’s at stake in North Korea and Iran, he claims, is nothing less than whether nuclear weapons become “commonplace” throughout the world.
Is North Korea trying to get John Bolton fired?
Anyone with an internet connection can watch the shaky footage showing the one-time strongman as he is bloodied, pummeled, grabbed by the hair, stripped and led to his death.
Later, his body lay in a refrigerator for several days for Libyans to gawk at, in violation of Islamic tenets that say the dead should be buried before the sun sets on the day they die.
To North Koreans, that's the "Libyan model of 2003, 2004."
Unintentionally or not, it was also the image evoked by White House National Security Advisor John Bolton on April 29, when he suggested nuclear talks with North Korea could emulate the 2003 negotiations with Libya.
To North Korean leader Kim Jong Un, set to meet President Donald Trump on June 12 in Singapore, that's a non-starter.
Bolton's comments so incensed Pyongyang that the regime singled out the one-time undersecretary of state for arms control in a blistering statement on Wednesday.
"It is absolutely absurd to dare compare the DPRK (Democratic People's Republic of Korea), a nuclear weapons state, to Libya, which had been at the initial stage of nuclear development," said Kim Kye Gwan, the first vice-minister of Foreign Affairs for North Korea.
"We shed light on the quality of Bolton already in the past, and we do not hide our feeling of repugnance towards him," Kim continued in the statement released by the state-run Korean Central News Agency.
The tone of Kim's statement, however, maintained a respectful tone for President Trump, saying he hopes the "Trump administration takes an approach to the summit with sincerity for improved relations," which, Kim said, "will receive a deserved response from us."
By focusing their ire on Bolton -- he didn't even merit an honorific in Kim's missive -- the North Koreans kept the door open to positive relations with Trump, while signaling that Bolton at the table in June would not be in the US leader's interest.
Bolton's comments so incensed Pyongyang that the regime singled out the one-time undersecretary of state for arms control in a blistering statement on Wednesday.
"It is absolutely absurd to dare compare the DPRK (Democratic People's Republic of Korea), a nuclear weapons state, to Libya, which had been at the initial stage of nuclear development," said Kim Kye Gwan, the first vice-minister of Foreign Affairs for North Korea.
"We shed light on the quality of Bolton already in the past, and we do not hide our feeling of repugnance towards him," Kim continued in the statement released by the state-run Korean Central News Agency.
The tone of Kim's statement, however, maintained a respectful tone for President Trump, saying he hopes the "Trump administration takes an approach to the summit with sincerity for improved relations," which, Kim said, "will receive a deserved response from us."
By focusing their ire on Bolton -- he didn't even merit an honorific in Kim's missive -- the North Koreans kept the door open to positive relations with Trump, while signaling that Bolton at the table in June would not be in the US leader's interest.
To the North Koreans, the high expectations surrounding the proposed summit offer multiple opportunities to attempt to manipulate the US, especially now that the prospect of a Nobel Peace Prize is suddenly in the mix.
A group of House Republicans have nominated Trump for the prestigious award and the word "Nobel!" has been on the lips of crowds at several of Trump's' most recent rallies.
Trump himself has said while "everyone thinks" he deserves a Nobel for his efforts with North Korea, he "would never say it."
"The prize I want is victory for the world. Not for even here, I want victory for the world 'cause that's what we're talking about. So that's the only prize I want," Trump said on May 9.
"They know Trump wants some great success," said Siracusa, adding that it's likely that Kim Jong Un would have gotten tips from Chinese President Xi Jinping on how to approach Trump.
Kim and Xi have already met twice in the lead-up to the summit. On Wednesday the Chinese foreign minister pressed for compromise, noting in a statement that the "initiative taken by North Korea is worthy of full recognition. All other parties, especially the United States, should cherish the current opportunity for peace."
He added that it is "necessary to prevent the situation while one party shows flexibility, the other party becomes tougher. There are such lessons in history. We don't want to see this happen again."
Only recently Trump's administration accommodated China by declaring it would find a way to spare Chinese technology company ZTE from a crippling export ban. "I think Kim has been taking lessons from Xi, the Chinese know how to play him (Trump) perfectly," said Siracusa.
Disagreements between a Trump trade adviser and Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin over trade talks with Beijing flared earlier this month, resulting in the adviser -- Peter Navarro -- being sidelined from this week's round of talks with Chinese officials in Washington.
'Counting on a cordial and successful summit'
The statement from North Korea minister Kim Kye Gwan on Wednesday excoriating Bolton included a warning that North Korea would pull out of the meeting with Trump if it was forced to unilaterally denuclearize, something Bolton is pushing.
"North Korea probably senses that Trump is counting on a cordial and successful summit to boost his reputation as an international statesman, especially ahead of US mid-term elections in November," noted analysts at research group BMI Research.
"Pyongyang is thus implying that 'denuclearization' (if it happens at all) must be a phased process with rewards accompanying each stage."
That flies in the face of what Bolton wants, and his rhetoric has distanced him even from the softer tones his boss has been voicing lately. Sidelining him would give North Korea a better hand when the time for negotiations comes.
Speaking to CNN, Seong Whun Cheon, a visiting research fellow at the Asan Institute for Policy Studies said North Korea probably does not expect Trump to outright fire Bolton, but likely believes it can influence Trump's calculations, especially in regard to key negotiation points.
"I'm concerned that North Korea has a good grasp of Trump's shaky political situation and is confident it can manipulate Trump to a certain extent," said Cheon, a former South Korean government official who worked in the defense and unification departments.
Even before his return to the fold under Trump, Bolton has long been synonymous inside North Korea with a more hawkish and unreasonable style of US diplomacy, suggested policy expert Adam Mount.
"North Korea has never believed Bolton was a credible interlocutor interested in diplomacy," said Mount. "Bolton has come to represent a particularly radical demand for immediate disarmament that is done essentially on faith that there would be future incentives."
"Bolton's hardline and unrealistic statements have led many to question whether he is committed to negotiations or prefer they collapse," Mount added.
On April 29, Bolton told CBS News that North Korea needed to present real evidence that it was giving up its nuclear weapons. When asked if the US would promise North Korea that it would not invade its country if Kim Jong Un abandoned his weapons, Bolton dodged the question.
"We've heard this before. This is, the North Korean propaganda playbook is an infinitely rich resource," he said.
In 2003 Libyan leader Col. Moammar Gadhafi agreed to abandon the country's attempts to develop a nuclear weapon and admitted international inspectors to verify that its nuclear sites had been dismantled. At the time, then-US President George W. Bush said Libya's decision would help lift it out of isolation.
"Libya has begun the process of rejoining the community of nations," Bush said in December 2003. "Old hostilities do not need to go on forever. I hope that other leaders will find an example in Libya's announcement today."
UN officials speculated that Gadhafi had been spooked by the invasion of Iraq and the ousting of dictator Saddam Hussein. Only days before Bush spoke, Saddam was captured by US troops.
Years later, however, the Arab Spring consumed the Middle East, and Gadhafi, under pressure to step down, found no support from the West. NATO warplanes policed a no-fly zone over Libyan skies, preventing Gadhafi from striking at rebel forces. After rebel forces took the capital he went into hiding.
He was eventually found in his hometown of Sirte, where rebels beat him and shot him in the back of the head.
Comentários
Postar um comentário