Chinese military cooperation to the Argentina: A Chinese military base in Argentina

The most strange thing is that the funny at Monroe Doctrine i being more and more explored. The Chinese invasion to America is not recent, but not in a large scale of doing a military base. The cooperation of USA with Colombia and Brazil is much more explored, since the perpetual problem with Venezuela, the Brazil for the economy and Colombia for a military cooperation, USA always explored a way to siege Venezuela and Argentina was always left by side, as Chile was always a good alied.

The order to put a military base in Argentina is a quick place to explore the USA activities in South America. Its a option to coordinate attacks and put a blindfold to the satelites against the geopolitical projection on South America.

A consequence is the instability at region and, also, at Chinese territory. The Hybrid scenario is clear with the possibility from since a Cold War treatening to the Chaotic reign.

The problem on this is that, we are close to the later Vostok maneouver and China were invited to learn the C2 operational proceeds and now, the military base operation in South America, together some Russian military business enterprises in Argentina is a fist at the USA projection to South America.

With the tactical plans of the Globalists to siege the USA economy, the Americans are retracted to the capability of aquire things, and he Argentina government close to the Globalist agenda made the Chinese plan to put a military base in South America capable to generate more cooperative in trade and financial transactions. Remember that Alibaba is the most important worldwide shopping via online and Americans are using the Chinese sellers to aquire what they want for low price.

China is a close borders to the Globalist governments, but with Argentina cooperation, the Siege for the USA projection in South America can be a little more difficult, as China is anti-USA geopolitical influence and Globalists are trying to siege the USA politics.

There is also a trade deficit of 30 billion dollars with China and the USA economy is getting weak as the Chinese money is very devalued and the imports from China grows more and more. Mainstream media will not address the military base as there is no interest to disrupt the NWO government programs.

The Chinese capitalism is very interventionist, and thers is an interest on keep the capital rowling as the government keeps the economy devalued and the USA society is injecting dollars in Chinese banks.

With this economic warfare the Globalists and One World Government are going for a New World Order about to enslave people around and keep the perpetual power and income. Remembering that Kirshner was a total supporter of George Soros and the Global leftists, that destroyed the tradition of the Argentina cultural and economic basis, destroying the patriotism in the country. Exemple of that is the referendum to the Falklands, when Argentinian decided to be English.

There is an invasion of geography when USA is at the cooperation to Japan after the Fukushima, both alied since WWII, but with close ties, and also with the possibility of North Korea invasion. Now, the Neocon program to promote cooperation with Hong Kong and USA 'via Blackwater' and now with the vicious relations, repeting the program of NATO, that USA is helping and cannot simply turn around. Also the provocative warfare in Syria made the projection to bring back the Brics relations and the Sino-Russian military cooperation.

Now there is a program of Mainstrem media and censorships and the cover-ups with news, that only close to 1% of news are real and not bias. The most trustable news are comming from independent writters and journalists, (like Guerra Assimétrica,, as many others - as Institute of War Studies, Small Wars Journal, Global Research, War on Want, etc. - for exemple) and the fake news is a part of the psyops from the global government, Neocon program, NWO agents and Globalists, as a tactical tool to reproduce what they want to reproduce and implement the thinking and behavior in society that they want.

No one will reproduce the truth beyond that military base in Argentina, as they create the core of observation and fast actions to Brazil, Chile and Colombia, implementing a stage of alert in America. Not a military promotion together BRICS in South America, but a space observation and fast military capability based in Revolution of Military Affairs and the order to implement the C2 and C3ISTR.

This reproduce the bringing back of the Cold War and the political challenges that Brazil, Venezuela, Argentina, Ecuador and Bolivial will have to play now, as the Brazilian elections are bringing back the conservative right again and a more liberal conservative economic thinking and market.

The promotion of Beijing propaganda in South America is trying to isolate the USA politics in South America in this new generations governments comming and promoting a 'proto-capitalism' and audacious space program, mining the USA geopolitical projection and alerting them to their military business in Asia-Pacific, as China is a very important player in the geopolitical game.

Now, the Hybrid scenario is going to a instability of military operations in South America with China acting in America and the USA acting in Hong Kong, both in siege to the others, as USA is playing in two fronts with Russia and overlaping NATO.

The possibility of the instability is a predicative of a Psychological Warfare, applying with the possibility of a conflict in Pacific but not declared, and the constant terror spread by fake news and propaganda in social networking media.

At this Hybrid scenario in South America, there is a docrine of assymetric conflicts with small units acting, and the infiltration of personel through the borders and the possibility of action with the local guerrillas. There is an important use of Command and Control to this point and the scenario of a virtual warfare is in course.

The Electronic Warfare as a capability and alternative instead of the direct conflict, and the recruit of mercenary hackers to put instability in government websites and steal information, and also a kind of 'satelite warfare' woth both countries in constant observation and cyberwarfare on each other.

It he case of a direct conflict, the potential Military Deception can be used, followed with the use of missiles and the airforce, at the fog of war and the bombardments of strategic points.

The possibility of Military Deception is close as they can use fictional units of feigned retreat. The following actions is to use the operational scenario to the direct combat.


The reflection of the hybridism is the direct combat is possible as both countries are armed and in each other's territory also.

From a Space Station in Argentina, China Expands Its Reach in Latin America

Our correspondent went to the deserts of Patagonia to examine how China secured its new base, a symbol of its growing clout in the region.

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/28/world/americas/china-latin-america.html

QUINTUCO, Argentina — The giant antenna rises from the desert floor like an apparition, a gleaming metal tower jutting 16 stories above an endless wind-whipped stretch of Patagonia.

The 450-ton device, with its hulking dish embracing the open skies, is the centerpiece of a $50 million satellite and space mission control station built by the Chinese military.

The isolated base is one of the most striking symbols of Beijing’s long push to transform Latin America and shape its future for generations to come — often in ways that directly undermine the United States’ political, economic and strategic power in the region.

The station began operating in March, playing a pivotal role in China’s audacious expedition to the far side of the moon — an endeavor that Argentine officials say they are elated to support.

But the way the base was negotiated — in secret, at a time when Argentina desperately needed investment — and concerns that it could enhance China’s intelligence-gathering capabilities in the Western Hemisphere have set off a debate in Argentina about the risks and benefits of being pulled into China’s orbit.

“Beijing has transformed the dynamics of the region, from the agendas of its leaders and businessmen to the structure of its economies, the content of its politics and even its security dynamics,” said R. Evan Ellis, a professor of Latin American studies at the United States Army War College.

For much of the past decade, the United States has paid little attention to its backyard in the Americas. Instead, it declared a pivot toward Asia, hoping to strengthen economic, military and diplomatic ties as part of the Obama administration’s strategy to constrain China.

Since taking office, the Trump administration has retreated from that approach in some fundamental ways, walking away from a free trade pact with Pacific nations, launching a global trade war and complaining about the burden of Washington’s security commitments to its closest allies in Asia and other parts of the world.

All the while, China has been discreetly carrying out a far-reaching plan of its own across Latin America. It has vastly expanded trade, bailed out governments, built enormous infrastructure projects, strengthened military ties and locked up tremendous amounts of resources, hitching the fate of several countries in the region to its own.

China made its intentions clear enough back in 2008. In a first-of-its-kind policy paper that drew relatively little notice at the time, Beijing argued that nations in Latin America were “at a similar stage of development” as China, with much to gain on both sides.

Leaders in the region were more than receptive. The primacy over Latin America that Washington had largely taken for granted since the end of the Cold War was being challenged by a cadre of leftist presidents who governed much of the region — including Brazil, Argentina, Venezuela, Ecuador, Uruguay and Bolivia — and wanted a more autonomous region.

Beijing’s invitation came at a fortuitous time: during the height of the financial crisis. Latching onto China’s voracious appetite for the region’s oil, iron, soybeans and copper ended up shielding Latin America from the worst of the global economic damage.

Then, as the price of oil and other commodities tanked in 2011, several countries in the region suddenly found themselves on shaky ground. Once again, China came to their aid, striking deals that further cemented its role as a central player in Latin America for decades.

Even with parts of Latin America shifting to the right politically in recent years, its leaders have tailored their policies to fulfill China’s demand. Now Beijing’s dominance in much of the region — and what it means for America’s waning stature — is starting to come into sharp focus.

“It’s a fait accompli,” said Diego Guelar, Argentina’s ambassador to China.

Back in 2013, he published a book with an alarming-sounding title: “The Silent Invasion: The Chinese Landing in South America.”

“It’s no longer silent,” Mr. Guelar said of China’s incursion in the region.

Trade between China and countries in Latin America and the Caribbean reached $244 billion last year, more than twice what it was a decade earlier, according to Boston University’s Global Development Policy Center. Since 2015, China has been South America’s top trading partner, eclipsing the United States.

Perhaps more significantly, China has issued tens of billions of dollars in commodities-backed loans across the Americas, giving it claim over a large share of the region’s oil — including nearly 90 percent of Ecuador’s reserves — for years.

China has also made itself indispensable by rescuing embattled governments and vital state-controlled companies in countries like Venezuela and Brazil, willing to make big bets to secure its place in the region.

Here in Argentina, a nation that had been shut out of international credit markets for defaulting on about $100 billion in bonds, China became a godsend for then-President Cristina Fernández de Kirchner.

And while it was extending a helping hand, China began the secret negotiations that led to the satellite and space control station here in Patagonia.

Frank A. Rose, an assistant secretary of state for arms control during the Obama administration, said he spent much of his time worrying about China’s budding space program. American intelligence and defense officials watched with alarm as China developed sophisticated technology to jam, disrupt and destroy satellites in recent years, he said.

“They are deploying these capabilities to blunt American military advantages, which are in many ways derived from space,” Mr. Rose said.

China is not alone in regarding space as a critical battlespace for future wars. Last month, the Trump administration announced it would create a sixth military branch devoted to space.

Antennas and other equipment that support space missions, like the kind China now has here in Patagonia, can increase China’s intelligence-gathering capabilities, experts say.

“A giant antenna is like a giant vacuum cleaner,” said Dean Cheng, a former congressional investigator who studies China’s national security policy. “What you are sucking up is signals, data, all sorts of things.”

Lt. Col. Christopher Logan, a Pentagon spokesman, said American military officials were assessing the implications of the Chinese monitoring station. Chinese officials declined requests for interviews about the base and their space program.

Beyond any strategic contest with the United States, some leaders in Latin America are now having doubts and regrets about their ties to China, worried that past governments have saddled their nations with enormous debt and effectively sold out their futures.

But Mr. Guelar argued that hitting the brakes on engagement with China would be shortsighted, particularly at a time when Washington has given up its longstanding role as the region’s political and economic anchor.

“There has been an abdication” of leadership by the United States, he said. “It surrendered that role not because it lost it, but because it doesn’t wish to take it on.”

Read the complete article at: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/28/world/americas/china-latin-america.html