The Club or Rome - and Roma Institute - A tentacle of Soros Funds - is implementing Roots in Serbia - George Soros and the Balkans Destabilization

Alekander Soros, vice president of the Foundation for Open Society's Managin board, had a meet with Serbia's President Alkandar Vicic in Belgrade and they decided that the NGO will continue to support Belgrade's reforms for democratic processes on the way to European Unition, as reported by Beta news.

This is the fourth meeting between Vucic and Soros in less than a year. 

According to the news and the press from the company, they spoke about the situation in region, the support of the Foundation to EU integration of Serbia and the reforms in the media, the rule of law and the backing of the regional economic zone.

"President Vucic informed Soros and members of the delegation with the situation in Kosovo and Metohija and the progress of the dialogue between Belgrade and Pristina," the press release said. 

"The topic of the discussion also included the support of the Foundation to a regional economic zone. Alexander Soros expressed his gratitude to the president of Serbia for the support that tOpen Society Foundations has in Serbia. He emphasized that the Foundation will continue to support Serbia on the European path, as well as reform and democratic processes. He welcomed the continuation of the Belgrade-Pristina dialogue and the constructive role of Serbia in maintaining stability in the Western Balkans region." 

Serbia Mulls Allowing Soros to Open Roma Institute

http://www.balkaninsight.com/en/article/serbia-s-soros-s-institute-branch-opening-discussed-with-vucic-04-20-2018

With the future of George Soros' institutions in Hungary in question, Serbia's President and the billionaire philanthropist's son, Alexander, have discussed opening a branch of the Open Society Foundation’s Roma Institute in Belgrade.

Serbian President Aleksandar Vucic on Friday met Alexander Soros, the son of billionaire philanthropist George Soros and Deputy Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Open Society Foundations, to discuss opening a branch of the Foundation’s Roma Institute in Serbia.

“The Foundation for an Open Society is ready to help as much as it can in improving the position of Roma in Serbia, which would greatly contribute to their greater participation in public life,” the press release from Vucic’s office said.

It added that besides the position of the Roma in Serbia, Vucic and Soros discussed Serbia's progress in European integration and raising the country's entrepreneurial spirit.

“Alexander Soros expressed readiness to further support reforms, strengthen the capacities of state institutions and strengthen democratic processes in Serbia,” the press release said.

It recalled that the Foundation had recently launched the European Roma Institute for Art and Culture in Berlin.

“Serbia has the opportunity to use European and national resources to improve the position of the most vulnerable citizens of Serbia, including Roma,” Soros was cited as saying.

The meeting ocurred on same day that media reported that the Open Society Foundations were reviewing the future of their Budapest office in the light of Hungarian leader Viktor Orban's fierce hostility to the institution, which he has accused of spreading propaganda and of having a pro-immigration agenda.

Serbia is far from the only country in the region where Soros-linked groups are routinely accused of subverting the nation and government.

Serbia itself has had its own controversies with Soros bodies.

Since the Progressive Party came to power in Serbia in 2012, Soros-backed groups have been often accused of financing anti-Vucic and anti-government campaigns. Soros himself is often mentioned as the sponsor of those intent on "destabilising" the Serbian state.

In March 2017, Vucic told Pink TV that he believed Soros was linked to anti-government protests both in Serbia and Russia.

“If we look at their [Russian] information, we see the same financiers, from Soros to some others,” he said.

In the same month, a Progressive Party MP, Vladimir Orlic, said be believed that Soros was “the father of the opposition” in Serbia.

On March 10, 2018, the website Republika owned by Serbian tabloid Srpski telegraf, claimed that Soros planned to invest milions into "breaking Vucic's power".

In November 2017, the pro-government tabloid Informer claimed that Soros was paying a Croatian MP in the European Parliament for anti-Serbian statements.

Earlier, on January 28, 2017, Aleksandar Vulin, Serbia's Labour Minister, claimed that opposition candidates in the upcoming presidential election – which Vucic won – were in the pay of Soros.

Also in January, the right-wing Nasi movement called for a new law that would outlaw the work of Open Society Foundations, following the example of Russia.

This is not first meeting between Vucic with Soros, however.

In November 2017, Vucic discussed regional cooperation, the Soros-backed Foundation for European Integration of Serbia, reforms in the media and the rule of law in Serbia with Alexander Soros.

In September that year, in New York, Vucic met both George and Alexander Soros, which Vucic later said had been “very interesting”.

“I’ve listened to them, they listened me. We did not deal with gossip, but serious things. We exchanged views of developments in the world, Europe, in the Balkans,” Vucic said, Insajder website reported.

Disclosure: Open Society Foundation is one of the donors of BIRN's Balkan Fellowship for Journalistic Excellence programme.

THE CLUB OF ROME - Taken from the Limits to Growth

Out of this meeting grew The Club of Rome, an informal organization that has been aptly described as an "invisible college." Its purposes are to foster understanding of the varied but interdependent components-economic, political, natural, and social-that make up the global system in which we all live; to bring that new understanding to the attention of policy-makers and the public worldwide; and in this way to promote new policy initiatives and action. 

Bilderberg Group Favours Serbian PM With Invitation

http://www.balkaninsight.com/en/article/serbian-prime-minister-at-the-bilderberg-group-meeting-02-02-2018

The staunchly pro-NATO Bilderberg Group has invited Serbian Prime Minister Ana Brnabic to attend its next next invitation-only conference in June in Italy – in what looks like a tribute to her Atlanticist credentials.

Danijel Kovacevic BIRN Banja Luka

Serbia's Prime Minister, Ana Brnabic, is the only person from the Western Balkans so far to have received an invitation to this year's Bilderberg group meeting from June 7 to 10 June in Turin, Italy.

Brnabic apparently received the invitation while attending the global business conference in Davos, Switzerland.

The official explanation is that Brnabic was given a call after her presentation at the New Leaders for Europe group meeting at the Davos forum.

As the only prime minister there from the region, Brnabic also participated in the report on migration and borders.

“It is a great honour for Serbia and a great opportunity for us to show our priorities, but also that Serbia is one of the important factors not only in this part of Europe”, Brnabic said on Tuesday.

Belgrade political analyst Cvijetin Milivojevic notes that the Bilderberg group supports NATO integration, free markets, strong ties between the US and Europe and the development of armed forces on the NATO pattern.

“So they did not invite someone from the Serbian government, who is, for example, pro-Russian or pro-Chinese oriented, or even someone who advocates sitting on two chairs. They called Ana Brnabic, who is synonymous [in Serbia] for the Euro-atlantic narrative,” Milivojevic told the RTRS broadcaster in Bosnia's mainly Serbian entity, Republika Srpska.

Since its inaugural meeting in the Hotel Bilderberg in the Netherlands in 1954, it has become an annual forum for informal discussions, designed to foster dialogue between Europe and North America.

Every year, between 120 and 150 political leaders and experts from industry, finance, academia and the media are invited to take part.

It is seen as a forum for informal discussions about megatrends and the major issues facing the world today.

According to the Bilderberg group website, “the meetings are held under the Chatham House Rule, which states that participants are free to use the information received, but neither the identity nor the affiliation of the speaker(s) nor of any other participant may be revealed".

It adds: "Thanks to the private nature of the meeting, the participants are not bound by the conventions of their office or by pre-agreed positions. There is no detailed agenda, no resolutions are proposed, no votes are taken, and no policy statements are issued.”

The Atlantic Council of Serbia said the reason for inviting the Prime Minister of Serbia most likely relates to the topic of this year's meeting.

“They will probably talk, not about Serbia itself, but probably about the Western Balkans,” Vlade Radulovic, from the Atlantic Council of Serbia, told the media.

However, Daniel Estulin, journalist and author of a critical book and documentary about the Bilderberg group, said that the invite "can't be good news" for Serbia.

“People who go to the Bilderberg group meeting represent a particular ideology that has nothing to do with nation, state or borders but has everything to do with super-national organizations, and the fact that Serbia's Prime Minister was invited is a sign of more trouble in your part of the world,” Estulin told BIRN.

Club of Rome Founder Proposed “Global Matrix” in 1970

http://humansarefree.com/2014/04/club-of-rome-founder-proposed-global.html

Environmental think tank aspired to global matrix of manufactured consent

Recently unearthed documents from the private collection of former diplomat and Bilderberg regular George C. McGhee have revealed (among other things) that the Club of Rome in 1970 wanted to create a “global matrix approach”, or G-Matrix approach, as a means of bringing people into an enviro-eugenicist mindset globally.

The Club of Rome was an influential think tank, advocating among other things worldwide population reduction and global environmental governance. The author of the uncovered manuscript from 1970 was Italian industrialist Aurelio Peccei, who founded the Club of Rome in 1968.

Peccei wrote that any acceptance of the Club’s conclusions “relies heavily on a global matrix approach.”

Furthermore he writes that these conclusions by the infamous Club (which includes advocacy of worldwide population reduction) can only be generally accepted “through (…) an iterative, global and substantive process. Through such a comprehensive process, writes Peccei, mankind can “gradually attain a value-base consensus, and avoid the prospects of a critical future situation.”

The work program exposition of the Club of Rome project relies heavily on the global (or G) matrix approach. It therefore appears desirable to start the discussion of the work program by explicating the structure and utility of such a matrix.”

The uncovered document from McGhee’s private collection states outright that the Club has sought to manufacture a consensus in all layers of society in regards to the conclusions of the Club’s reports as published in the early 1970s.

“It should be pointed out (…) that such a consensus is meant to provide “the initial conditions” for the operational evolution of the Club of Rome Project”, Aurelio wrote in 1970.

“It should only be viewed as an exemplary value-base whose universality, validity, and credibility depends on the judgments of the DELPHI technique participants. Nevertheless, it will represent an attempt for a substantive and professionally coordinated delineation of the “Predicament of Mankind”. The more groups engage in similar intellectual efforts, the more meaningful the dialogue on the worldwide problematique will become.”

This “problematique” is being described as “the constantly widening cultural, economic and technological gaps among nations, or the fearsome multiplication of the population on a finite planet, or the transnational phenomenon of youth rebellion, or the possibility of crossing the threshold past which it will be feasible to manipulate human genetic material.”

The mention of the DELPHI method in the context of this information-snippet about a global matrix of manufactured consent is interesting. According to Wikipedia, the method has been widely used for business forecasting and other forecasting “covering such topics as scientific breakthroughs, population control, automation, space progress, war prevention and weapon systems.”

As I covered in an earlier article, the predictive systems and models of the Club of Rome were used by the Chinese to set up their brutal one-child policy. In 1978, a group of Chinese scientists visited several scientific conferences in Europe, and readily picked up on the ideas distributed by the Club of Rome.

At the head of this Chinese delegation was a man credited for introducing China’s notorious one-child policies, source of so much hardship suffered by the Chinese people in the last decades. Robert Zubrin, senior fellow with the center for security policy, published an op-ed in the Washington Times, reaffirming that Greenhalgh’s study is correct. Zubrin wrote:

“In June 1978, Song Jian, a top-level manager in charge of developing control systems for the Chinese guided-missile program, traveled to Helsinki for an international conference on control-system theory and design.

While in Finland, he picked up copies of “The Limits to Growthand: Blueprint for Survival”- publications of the Club of Rome, a major source of Malthusian propaganda – and made the acquaintance of several Europeans who were promoting the report’s method of using computerized “systems analysis” to predict and design the human future.”

To illustrate that the Global Matrix was further developed, the 1991 publication The First Global Revolution: A Report to the Club of Rome shows us that early on the common denominator was invented around which the world could rally, thereby creating a common purpose:

“In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution,the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill. All these dangers are caused by human intervention, and it is only through changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome. The real enemy then, is humanity itself.”

The concept of a Global Matrix of manufactured consent, as described and developed by the founder of the Club of Rome, illustrate that the scam is perpetrated on such an unprecedented scale, that up until a few years ago few dared question its validity.

By Jurriaan Maessen, Explosive Reports;