Iran and Syria: Bullseye of ISIS and the Upheavel against the Revolutionary Global Terror
The target point is the Eurasia and the USA projection. The multi targets comes from many directions. Starting with the "proxy 'Cold War'" between Russia and USA, using Syria to promote the operational field for the tactics and power demonstration.
Also, the projection of USA through Asia-Pacific in North Korea and Hong Kong in a way to siege Russia by Pacific and European 'Middle East'. NATO is a tool for USA promote the military power and diplomacy in Europe, but with Trump the decisions are going hard because the center-leftist governments and globalist bankers around Europe, like Deutchland for exemple.
Vladimir Putin and Erdogan promoted the demilitarized zone in Syria to restore government influence in Idlib and promote also support for the peace keeping and pro-Regime forces.
Erdogan also is in the middle of a game, one side with Russian leadership and aliance, supporting the nationalist and anti-Globalist government, in other part, a Muslim country in Europe with problems in the continent, but a member of NATO, in theoretics, alied of USA, but military and political alied of Russia.
Five points: Ukraine being a next proxy between the countries, with extremist pro-Russia, extremist ultra-nationalists and a politic pro-NATO; Balkans are still with no leadership and no real identity, except the nationalism, a good oportunity to nationalist and Evolians promote the identity of the country based in traditionalism and focus in the International Relations; Iran is the target of the USA and Syria is the actual proxy between east and west, step ahead through Ukraine; The Ressurgence of ISIS and the local terrorism in an advanced position through Europe with possible lone wovles, sleeping cells and the controverseal new tactics the group are using; Vostok 2018 showed that Russia is some steps ahead USA and NATO, and they will search for proxies to promote power demonstration and not go into a direct conflict, because of the scale it will turn to.
Iran is the target of USA, but a direct clash between them would start a new large-scaled conflic, so the idea is to promote the small-scaled conflicts in determined zones and focus in power projection...
In this case, ISIS will try to take the power in Syria, as it's the focus of the Caliphate since the begining, as it was in Iraq, than the group will try to promote attacks in Iran, focused in take the power in the country, destablizing the government and ressurrect the Caliphate in the Persian lands, as the Iranian Kurds fought in ISIS in an anti-Regime program.
Read more at: https://www.globalresearch.ca/video-iran-carries-out-missile-drone-strikes-on-isis-in-euphrates-valley/5655903
ISIS is an anti-Assad group and the Hezbollah presence with Iran and Russia helped to promote support to the government, while USA was supporting Turkey and the Kurds were focused on fight ISIS in the territory, so Hezbollah was a point to secure the Assad's regime, helping on reorganize the pro-Assad Syria Democratic Forces.
Raising the theoretics that the ISIS was formed by the Obama followers and the CIA support for the destablization of the Middle East and the Europe to promote the Neocon-Obama aliance for the Global Americanism and the support of a national bank, ISIS must regret to zero the Iranian influential politician in Syria, and as a strong supporter of Russia in the region.
The idea is to put a frontline and illegal force into the direct clash, with mercenaries and ideological people around to promote fear and chaos, than give the solution, this is the international counter terrorism. It's the dialectic for the promotion of braiwashing and media control, implementation of philantropy and international NGOs and banks and mega corporations, appropriating the natural resources enjoying cheap labor manpower.
But now, with Trump with the support of Neocon personal with more ultra-nationalism, ISIS maybe will apply other tactics, not with direct clash, but with mediatic and political influence, and with this, the promotion of local criminal activity in charge of terrorism, will be the new strategy of the group.
With this political activity, and the possible CIA influence into a NWO in the region, promoted by the Neocon strategy, the idea is to turn the leader of ISIS into the Manchurian Candidate. And maybe, also use the local leadership into a part of the MK-Ultra project, of braiwashing control, and hitman, to promote media control, implementation of western culture and anomy and than the complete domination of Middle East.
Read more at: https://www.haaretz.com/middle-east-news/syria/.premium.MAGAZINE-iran-russia-and-isis-how-assad-won-in-syria-1.6462751
So, the focus of the USA geopolitcal strategy was always the Heartland and to promote this projection was to conquest the Persian territory, and ISIS is searching a way to promote the Great Muslim State in Iran, for revenge in it's resistance and also promote the Sharia regime in the lands, absorbing the natural resources and stablishing political leadership...
Iran Lobs Ballistic Missiles at Iraq and Syria
Also, the projection of USA through Asia-Pacific in North Korea and Hong Kong in a way to siege Russia by Pacific and European 'Middle East'. NATO is a tool for USA promote the military power and diplomacy in Europe, but with Trump the decisions are going hard because the center-leftist governments and globalist bankers around Europe, like Deutchland for exemple.
Vladimir Putin and Erdogan promoted the demilitarized zone in Syria to restore government influence in Idlib and promote also support for the peace keeping and pro-Regime forces.
Erdogan also is in the middle of a game, one side with Russian leadership and aliance, supporting the nationalist and anti-Globalist government, in other part, a Muslim country in Europe with problems in the continent, but a member of NATO, in theoretics, alied of USA, but military and political alied of Russia.
Five points: Ukraine being a next proxy between the countries, with extremist pro-Russia, extremist ultra-nationalists and a politic pro-NATO; Balkans are still with no leadership and no real identity, except the nationalism, a good oportunity to nationalist and Evolians promote the identity of the country based in traditionalism and focus in the International Relations; Iran is the target of the USA and Syria is the actual proxy between east and west, step ahead through Ukraine; The Ressurgence of ISIS and the local terrorism in an advanced position through Europe with possible lone wovles, sleeping cells and the controverseal new tactics the group are using; Vostok 2018 showed that Russia is some steps ahead USA and NATO, and they will search for proxies to promote power demonstration and not go into a direct conflict, because of the scale it will turn to.
Iran is the target of USA, but a direct clash between them would start a new large-scaled conflic, so the idea is to promote the small-scaled conflicts in determined zones and focus in power projection...
In this case, ISIS will try to take the power in Syria, as it's the focus of the Caliphate since the begining, as it was in Iraq, than the group will try to promote attacks in Iran, focused in take the power in the country, destablizing the government and ressurrect the Caliphate in the Persian lands, as the Iranian Kurds fought in ISIS in an anti-Regime program.
Read more at: https://www.globalresearch.ca/video-iran-carries-out-missile-drone-strikes-on-isis-in-euphrates-valley/5655903
ISIS is an anti-Assad group and the Hezbollah presence with Iran and Russia helped to promote support to the government, while USA was supporting Turkey and the Kurds were focused on fight ISIS in the territory, so Hezbollah was a point to secure the Assad's regime, helping on reorganize the pro-Assad Syria Democratic Forces.
Raising the theoretics that the ISIS was formed by the Obama followers and the CIA support for the destablization of the Middle East and the Europe to promote the Neocon-Obama aliance for the Global Americanism and the support of a national bank, ISIS must regret to zero the Iranian influential politician in Syria, and as a strong supporter of Russia in the region.
The idea is to put a frontline and illegal force into the direct clash, with mercenaries and ideological people around to promote fear and chaos, than give the solution, this is the international counter terrorism. It's the dialectic for the promotion of braiwashing and media control, implementation of philantropy and international NGOs and banks and mega corporations, appropriating the natural resources enjoying cheap labor manpower.
But now, with Trump with the support of Neocon personal with more ultra-nationalism, ISIS maybe will apply other tactics, not with direct clash, but with mediatic and political influence, and with this, the promotion of local criminal activity in charge of terrorism, will be the new strategy of the group.
With this political activity, and the possible CIA influence into a NWO in the region, promoted by the Neocon strategy, the idea is to turn the leader of ISIS into the Manchurian Candidate. And maybe, also use the local leadership into a part of the MK-Ultra project, of braiwashing control, and hitman, to promote media control, implementation of western culture and anomy and than the complete domination of Middle East.
Read more at: https://www.haaretz.com/middle-east-news/syria/.premium.MAGAZINE-iran-russia-and-isis-how-assad-won-in-syria-1.6462751
So, the focus of the USA geopolitcal strategy was always the Heartland and to promote this projection was to conquest the Persian territory, and ISIS is searching a way to promote the Great Muslim State in Iran, for revenge in it's resistance and also promote the Sharia regime in the lands, absorbing the natural resources and stablishing political leadership...
Iran Lobs Ballistic Missiles at Iraq and Syria
The air force sits out Tehran's retaliatory strikes
On Sept. 8 and Oct. 1, 2018, Iran launched major missile strikes targeting its adversaries in both Iraqi Kurdistan and Syria in the most significant series of missile strikes the country has undertaken in almost two decades.
The October strike targeted Islamic State militants near the eastern Syrian border town of Abu Kamal. It followed a terrorist attack on an Iranian Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps parade in the city of Ahvaz on Sept. 22. The attack killed 29 IRGC members, regular Iranian soldiers and even some civilian onlookers.
The IRGC fired long-range Zulfiqar missiles and Qiam-1 missiles at the ISIS targets. It’s unclear how many ISIS members or civilians the missiles ultimately killed and wounded.
The September strike targeted Iranian Kurdish dissident groups based in Iraqi Kurdistan. The missiles hit a headquarters belonging to the group in the Iraqi Kurdish town of Koya, killing at least 17 and wounding scores of people, including women and children. The IRGC fired six Fateh-110 missiles at the target.
The Koya attack came after renewed clashes between Iranian Kurdish insurgents and the IRGC in Iran’s volatile western frontier provinces.
Before this, the only Iranian missile strike targeting against Tehran’s enemies this decade happened on June 18, 2017. That strike targeted ISIS in Deir Ez Zor province following an attack by that group on Iran’s Majlis parliament in Tehran earlier the same month.
As with the more recent Abu Kamal strike, the IRGC used Zulfiqars — which are a longer-range variant of the Fateh-110s — and Qiam-1s.
Before that the last major Iranian missile strike targeting adversaries beyond its borders transpired in April 2001 — a strike that targeted camps belonging to the People’s Mujahedin of Iran militant group across Iraq and used far older Iranian Scuds and Shahab missiles than these recent attacks. That strike followed a series of Iranian missile launches targeting militants in Iraq throughout the 1990s.
Iran’s recent use of missiles in combat underscored some shortcomings. Iranian missiles went off course more than once during these strikes. Footage from the October attack showed two of the Qiam-1 missiles crashing inside Iran, which means at least one-third of the strike package didn’t make it near its targets.
Following the June 2017 strike, photographs appeared of missile wreckage in Iraq, hundreds of miles from their intended target.
More broadly, the attacks demonstrated the headway Iran has made in missile production over the last few decades. The Shah’s military had an enormous and modern air force for its time, but lacked ballistic missiles. His Islamic Republic successor has since made significant headway in both acquiring and producing ballistic missiles.
The IRGC has long favored missile development over modernizing the conventional military. In 2015 IRGC rivalry with the conventional Iranian military dashed Tehran’s opportunity to upgrade its air force with 30 sophisticated, Russian-made Su-30 Flanker air superiority jet fighters and the regular army with 300 T-90 main battle tanks, also from Russia.
The IRGC gave its own small fleet of Su-25 Frogfoot ground-attack planes to Iraq in August 2014 in order to help Baghdad combat ISIS. Today its air force consists of around a dozen Su-22 Fitter attack planes, which it overhauled in July 2018.
While ballistic missile development is a notable achievement, it’s arguable that Iran’s own air force could have done the job in Kurdistan. F-4 Phantom II jet-fighter bombers that Iran has possessed since the 1960s and ’70s could just as efficiently destroyed fixed, defenseless targets.
For Iran’s last strike on Syria on Oct. 1, which struck just three miles from U.S. troops, using ballistic missiles made since, as U.S. warplanes have swiftly downed Iranian drones and Syrian planes violating the nearby air space.
 |
| At top — Iranian Revolutionary Guards personnel watch the launch of a Zelzal missile. Mehr News Agency. Above — an Iranian long-range Shahab-1 missile launched during the second day of military exercises, codenamed Great Prophet-7, for Iran’s elite Revolutionary Guards at an undisclosed location in Iran’s Kavir Desert in 2012. ISNA photo |
Spotlight on Iran
September 20, 2018 – October 7, 2018
Editor: Dr. Raz Zimmt
https://www.terrorism-info.org.il/en/spotlight-iran-september-20-2018-october-7-2018/
Some featured points:
- On the night of October 1, the IRGC launched a number of ballistic missiles toward the area of Albu Kamal in southeastern Syria in response to an attack, carried out on September 22 against a military parade in Ahvaz, southwestern Iran, which killed at least 25 people. According to Iranian reports, six missiles were fired from the Kermanshah region in western Iran for a range of 570 kilometers, passed in Iraqi air space and hit a headquarters of “armed groups” east of the Euphrates River in Syria. The missile launch was accompanied by strikes carried out by seven armed drones. According to Iran, a large number of terrorists connected to the attack on Ahvaz were killed and injured in the attacks. Iranian sources also claim that infrastructure and weapon depots used by the terrorists were also destroyed. The Commander of the IRGC’s Aerospace Force, Amir Ali Hajizadeh, said that intelligence for the strike was provided by the IRGC’s Qods Force, adding that it was impossible to use drones to collect intelligence since the area targeted is under American monitoring. He claimed that 40 ISIS militants were killed in the strike, including the Iraqi commander of the Mosul region in the organization, adding that all the targets of the attack were destroyed (Fars, October 2).
- The Iraqi news website al-Ghad Press reported that the Commander of the IRGC’s Qods Force, Qasem Soleimani, recently warned the United States against trying to harm the Shi’ite militias in Iraq. According to this report, cited by Iranian media outlets, Soleimani proclaimed that “the gates of hell” will be opened on the United States, if it tries to attack the Shi’ite militias (the al-Hashd al-Shaabi, Popular Mobilization Units) and the forces of Islamic resistance in Iraq (Kayhan, September 25).
- The Iranian news website Fararu assessed (September 29), that the conflict between Iran and the United States on Iraqi soil has intensified in recent months and entered a new stage. The expert on Middle Eastern affairs, Hassan Hanizadeh, said in an interview to the website that the United States and Saudi Arabia have tried to engender anti-Iranian sentiment in Iraq, but contrary to their expectations, they have discovered that this did not happen and they reached the conclusion that they are unable to close off Iraq’s gates before Iran. The United States is trying, according to him, to exploit its ties to the Iraqi Baath Party to stymie Iranian influence in Iraq and isolate it, but it is struggling to do so because most Iraqis have a special connection to Iran. The Iranian commentator asserted that any harm to Iraq’s security may threaten Iran’s national security due to Iran’s position in Iraq and the long border between the two countries.
Spotlight on Global Jihad (September 17 – October 3, 2018)
Published: 04/10/2018
Some featured points:
- On September 17, 2018, Russian President Vladimir Putin and Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan met in Sochi, Russia. Their talks centered on the Syrian regime’s planned attack on the rebel organizations in the Idlib area, the preparations for which were nearing completion. According to the agreement that was reached, a demilitarized zone 15-20 km wide will be established in the Idlib area, separating the areas controlled by the Syrian army and the areas controlled by the rebel organizations. According to the agreement, the demilitarized zone will be established by October 15, 2018, and the heavy weapons of the rebel organizations will be removed by October 10.
- The Sochi agreement marks a breakthrough in the contacts between Russia, Turkey, and Iran to resolve the situation in Idlib, after disputes developed between them at the Tehran summit. The one to gain the most from the agreement is apparently Turkey, which managed to prevent the planned attack on the Idlib area. However, in the ITIC’s assessment, this gain is temporary, since the possibility of the attack still remains, and spokesmen for the Syrian regime have made this very clear. On the ground, however, there is no significant progress towards the implementation of the agreement. The Headquarters for the Liberation of Al-Sham and the Turkish-sponsored rebel organizations have made it clear that they do not intend to remove their forces and weapons from the demilitarized zone and to permit the entry of Russian and Turkish forces.
- Putin said that both sides had decided to establish a demilitarized zone 15-20 km wide along the line of contact between the forces of the Syrian regime and the opposition forces, which would be carried out by October 15, 2018. This would be accompanied by the removal of the “extremist armed forces” (including those belonging to the Headquarters for the Liberation of Al-Sham) from the demilitarized zone (which will be established, as implied by the decision, in an area under the control of the rebel organizations). In addition, at the suggestion of the Turkish President, by October 10, 2018, the heavy weapons, tanks, rocket launchers, rifles and mortar shells of all opposition groups will be removed from the demilitarized zone. Supervision of the demilitarized zone will be carried out by Turkish mobile patrol groups and Russian Military Police units. Until that time, Turkey will reinforce its observation posts in the area.
An ISIS-inspired tactic is raising concerns in US ports
https://www.businessinsider.com/an-isis-inspired-tactic-is-raising-concerns-in-us-ports-2018-10
The US Coast Guard has a number of threats it needs to worry about when dealing with boats and their crews on US waterways, but boats without crews are adding a new wrinkle to the problem.
"There is an emergence in the Middle East with ISIS of using unmanned remotely controlled vessels that are packed with explosives, and that would pose a significant challenge," Lt. Cmdr. Devon Brennan, the commander of the Coast Guard's Maritime Safety and Security Team in New York, said on Friday during a use-of-force demonstration.
The Coast Guard's MSSTs are tasked with security operations in US harbors and waterways. They were created in 2002, primarily to provide rapid-response anti-terrorism capability, protecting shipping, vessels, and infrastructure.
During the demonstration, Brennan's team practiced intercepting an unidentified vessel, gradually escalating from verbal commands to warning shots to shots to disable the vessel's engine, using blank rounds.
Unmanned vessels present something of an asymmetric threat, however.
"Usually our tactics are developed around the fact that we can get an individual to stop and comply, but if it's just a vessel that's being remotely controlled, and that person [controlling it] obviously has no fear for their life, it creates more of a difficult situation for us," Brennan said during an interview aboard the Coast Guard cutter Sikinak.
"We have the tactics in place to target that type of vessel," Brennan added. But such an encounter "would be of significance," he said, "particularly if there are explosives on board and we're firing rounds at the vessel. Potentially that thing is going to explode."
Jihad and Terrorism Threat Monitor (JTTM) Weekend Summary
Comentários
Postar um comentário