The psycho-war that made Covid-19 being a greater weapon

According to Seneca, the Roman Philosopher, we suffer more in imagination than in reality.

See that the fact and the fear comes together. The fact is that there are something acting. But the psychological fear is promoting it bigger as it really is. The fact makes the things go in a direction but fear makes the moral actions provoke a virtual relation between the physical world than the phantasy. 

Than since the creation of possibility of scenarios, the intuiton can surpass the statistics while the numbers say something and the lack of the credibility of government makes the intuition be alleatory numering deaths and real causes. 

The traditional man can use the scientific and factual history to promote a healthy mind and a healthy body to surpass the crisis, each crisis. Every crisis. But the modern man, full of wicked things and idolatry, leave it to governments and to religious idols. After a chaos, the one who can survive more, is the more able, freed of idolatry and capable to run by itself, moved by values and love.

In reality, the strenght comes from the inside of mind. After the lockdown, the ones capable to survive will be the ones autonomous, the ones who can fight and belive in the selves, not who put the salvation on idolatries or governments. Learning and preparing to fight is the essence of each one. This biochaotic scenario is a kind of biologic Darwinism, promoting a race for the fittest who can survive of the mass death world wide.Who survive the sickeness than survive to the collapse.

The collapse comes to promote a race for the new abilities. During destructive scenario, with a self destructive nature of men, while the collapse is running, the essence of men must be found again. Only who can find themselves will be able to reconstruct.

According to Evola, "The technocratic error of thinking of ‘war potential’ primarily in terms of arms and armaments, special technical-industrial equipment and the like, and assessing man – according to the brutal expression now widespread in military literature – simply as ‘human resources’ – has already been widely criticised. The quality and spirit of the men to whom the arms, the means of offence and destruction, are given have represented, still represent and will always represent the basic element of ‘war potential’.