The Blackwater model is gone Jihadi - the business terrorism

When Nietzsche once said that "Under a peaceful condition, a warlike man attacks himself", he was going beyond every single moral that promoted man, himself, a valuable man, breaking values once were important for a character and going to the needs and, promoting new social values, different from before.

The world full of warriors that are formed to achieve political goals, goes beyond man's understandings. The fighting and promotional warfare for lands, influence, resoureces and environment raised a level, scaled Machiavelean, of importance of national values, leadership and identity, that with the globalisation and information, gone thicker. Social values now are promoted by concrete, but financial, and values are priced. So in a civilization that promoved religious and identitary-national values, forgot to give back the return on what they constructed, forming a non-identitary society.

When we see lot of well trained men, gone to special forces to fight purposes, we expect them to understand their place at society, as soldiers and servants of an ideal, but we see the consequence of men beind disposed and replaced by new dinamic forms of action, adequacy for new model of social behaviors and than military personal losts his identity on their belifs.

We saw it Rambo's First Blood the problem of how a man are dispensed to armies and the difficulty of having a job, considered sometimes a pariah for society, and see that nowadays things didn't fix, for ex-military. But now we have more information, new forms of recruitment, and fast spread of information, doing a possibility or replacement on new stages of their selves.

Lack of moral and moral values are in constant clash.

Jihadi groups, since Al Qaeda, used to recruit local members as promoting Al Qaeda a holding for small business franchiging model, what made a good business to promote terorism from outsourced groups and honoring themselves with the title of the attacker.

When the reality of civil society brings up the difficulties of being a 'normal' man, searching for a plae of socity and living in laws, are problematic to those who didn't have a technic formation or a civilized living, and became real warriors, and the need to have a war is necessary to their economic lives.

The market business is promotes big corporation and the scenario they build to promove their goals.

In this promotion, the break of some values and morals make the 'well trained men' act many times amoral and anti-ethic, by leading their path against the reason they were raised before. This shock of morals and values like the religious beliefs, nationalism, reconigtion now clash with the reality of lack of reconigtion, job offering off their reality, new circle of knowledge, economic needs, money problems, social pathologies, and the need of living in a capitalistic society, that doesn't raise values but money order, make these people go to a side, once against, but, now favorable, because of the offering of oportunities and jobs.

And the corporative-Darwinism is promoted by a group, an elitist group, of businessman that promotes, together bankers, environmentalists, philantropists and statesmen, needs to promote warfare, searching for good scenarios, nor even favorable to ones who are in the battlefield, but offering jobs, that's how mercenarism went on again to the main program of new scalation warfare.

Revolution in Military Affairs went also promoting new technologies, and adaptating to the new ones, even more dynamic, that are making more possible to recruit, contact, and spread propaganda, and corrupt some minds that need that chaotic scenario to make a self reconigtion. Remembering the suicide numbers are big, alchoolic and drug addiction has grown between ex-military personal.

The corporate model that Blackwater brought back, regret some of these values, and implement a new value that a citizen can join an army and fight for some ideal, even if it's not the ones of himself was risen, but a value that corporation raises, a new flag, another country's value, that gives him oportunities to raise himself economicaly and socialy.

Now, terrorist groups copied this model to promote not only lone wolves contractors, but operational. PMCs in failed countries raise new flags of nationalism, promoting oportunities to unemployed people and fight for his country, under a contract, and with no legal contract with the public sector.

These ex-military are very requested for operational terrorists, that need success at their actions.

Also, other kind of criminal activities like guerrillas, that need their expertise to promote local militias; Militias to create a fake security, localized, with charge of money; international drug traffick; local criminal activities and sexual exploration; criminal net and recruitment for lone wolves; and also, to make security of drug lords, cartels and other criminal leaders. Military and Special Forces training, and battlefield experience put him on advantage on others.

Jihadists searching for overseas contracting, different level of recruitment for lone wolves, because to operational focus, they need well trained men, capable to lead and capable to achieve goals, capable to complete the mission. And this recruitment goes to the ones who are unsatisfied economicaly with the reality after the military life. The Dogs of War, ones who were trained for a goal and there is no more reason to be applied.

Now we have models of outsourcing terrorist groups, with foreigners, ethnicaly differents, many times with other faith, with different family values, but raising new moral values, for a position on a group, be it criminal or not, mercenary.

That's how the peaceful scenario is not favorable to special forces trained personal, for a clash of ethics and amorality, to put him on a self realization, even if it goes against their former morals.

The PMCs and the impacts are favorable. The PMCs are a model of business that came to promote this activity, from private security on extreme scenarios to large scale conflict, small wars and mercenarism, brough oportunity to the mercenary/soldier to fight for his country, under the contract of his government, with a logic of a national corporation, acting overseas.

Hesso: Turkish mercenaries are continuation to Daesh, regime must accept democratic Syria's project

Aisha Hesso said, "Coalition countries must show a firm stance on the Syrian territories occupied by Turkey and its mercenaries because they are the main supply lines for Daesh, and the Syrian regime must accept the democratic Syria's project to get out of the crisis."

https://hawarnews.com/en/haber/hesso-turkish-mercenaries-are-continuation-to-daesh-regime-must-accept-democratic-syrias-project-h8031.html

The co-chair of the Democratic Union Party (PYD) Aisha Hesso talked in an interview with Hawar news agency (ANHA) about Daesh's defeat militantly and the Turkish occupation's plans in north and east of Syria, and said: "It is no secret that all the mercenary and terrorist gangs that have emerged in north and east of Syria are linked to the Turkish authorities. They are changing names and clothes only."

Aisha Hesso said that the victory over IS mercenaries in conjunction with Newroz celebrations created a new historic victory for humanity, and said: "The mercenaries, who entered Afrin with the Turkish occupation, initially destroyed the statue of Kawa al-Haddad, the symbol of freedom and peace and the torch of Newroz for the Kurdish people. By triumphing over Daesh, Newroz and the spirit of Kawa were reborn, and those mercenaries who worked to enslave women were defeated by the power of free women fighters. The entire world owes today to the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) for their victory and to rid the world of the largest terrorist and bloody terrorist organization of the modern era."

The areas of the "Euphrates Shield" mercenaries are corridors, and base of Daesh

Aisha noted that the silence of the international community towards the Turkish violations and occupation of Syria made Turkey plans to stay longer in Syria, and said: "Since 2011, the Turkish occupation has been planning and plotting to occupy the north and east of Syria, and its goal is to exterminate the Kurdish people in this region and that was clear through Turkey's support for Daesh during its attacks on Kobani. And today, Turkey and its mercenaries occupy Afrin and commit the most egregious violations, all this is taking place amid international silence and disregard for the violations of Turkey for the sake of their interests, and this silence encourages Turkey to continue planning to stay permanently in Syria. Therefore, the international community must show its frank attitude towards the occupation of Turkey and its mercenaries to the north and east of Syria, especially as these occupied areas have become a passage and a base for Daesh after their defeat in their last stronghold."

The mentality of all Turkey's mercenaries is one and the difference is only in their clothes

Aisha Hesso confirmed that all the mercenary gangs existed in the northern regions of Syria with different names are linked to Turkey and are associated with the same mentality of Daseh and the Turkish fascism, and their different names are only a change of clothes, but the mentality does not change. Although some countries have issued statements and reports confirming Turkey's direct support for Daseh, but it should not be just talking and there must be a practical action to expose Erdogan's government and hold it accountable for supporting terrorism.

The Syrian regime must accept democratic Syria's project

Aisha Hesso said at the end of her speech that the biggest obstacles facing a solution to the Syrian crisis is the Turkish occupation and interference in the Syrian issue, and said: "Turkey is constantly deepening the Syrian crisis. Therefore, the Syrian regime must look positively at the victories achieved by the Syrian Democratic Forces that defeated and liberated the north and east of Syria, but unfortunately, the regime did not issue any statement and did not show any good faith towards SDF who defeated Daesh. This shows that the mentality of the Syrian regime is still exclusionary, and it must accept Syria's democratic project until the country gets out from its crisis."

Turkey accused of recruiting ex-Isis fighters in their thousands to attack Kurds in Syria

Exclusive: Former Isis fighter tells The Independent that Turkey is using the name of the now defunct, Western-backed Free Syrian Army to conceal its use of jihadi mercenaries

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/turkey-isis-afrin-syria-kurds-free-syrian-army-jihadi-video-fighters-recruits-a8199166.html

Turkey is recruiting and retraining Isis fighters to lead its invasion of the Kurdish enclave of Afrin in northern Syria, according to an ex-Isis source.

“Most of those who are fighting in Afrin against the YPG [People’s Protection Units] are Isis, though Turkey has trained them to change their assault tactics,” said Faraj, a former Isis fighter from north-east Syria who remains in close touch with the jihadi movement.

In a phone interview with The Independent, he added: “Turkey at the beginning of its operation tried to delude people by saying that it is fighting Isis, but actually they are training Isis members and sending them to Afrin.”

An estimated 6,000 Turkish troops and 10,000 Free Syrian Army (FSA) militia crossed into Syria on 20 January, pledging to drive the YPG out of Afrin.

The attack was led by the FSA, which is a largely defunct umbrella grouping of non-Jihadi Syrian rebels once backed by the West. Now, most of its fighters taking part in Turkey’s “Operation Olive Branch” were, until recently, members of Isis.

Some of the FSA troops advancing into Afrin are surprisingly open about their allegiance to al-Qaeda and its offshoots. A video posted online shows three uniformed jihadis singing a song in praise of their past battles and “how we were steadfast in Grozny (Chechnya) and Dagestan (north Caucasus). And we took Tora Bora (the former headquarters of Osama bin Laden). And now Afrin is calling to us".

Isis suffered heavy defeats last year, losing Mosul in Iraq after a siege of nine months and Raqqa in Syria after a four-month siege. The caliphate, declared by its leader Abu Baqr al-Baghdadi in 2014, was destroyed, and most of its experienced commanders and fighters were killed or dispersed.

But it has shown signs of trying to revive itself in Syria and Iraq over the last two months, assassinating local opponents and launching guerrilla attacks in out-of-the-way and poorly defended places.

Isis fighters are joining the FSA and Turkish-army invasion force because they are put under pressure by the Turkish authorities. From the point of view of Turkey, the recruitment of former Isis combatants means that it can draw on a large pool of professional and experienced soldiers. Another advantage is that they are not Turks, so if they suffer serious casualties this will do no damage to the Turkish government.

Isis and Turkey are seeking to use each other for their own purposes. Faraj, 32, an Arab from the mixed Kurdish-Arab province of Hasakah in north-east Syria, says that he does not like the YPG, but he is suspicious of Turkey and believes that it is trying manipulate Isis. “Turkey treats Isis like toilet tissues,” he says. “After use they will be thrown away.”

Turkey is evidently aware that using Isis fighters as the spearhead for the assault on Afrin, even if they relabelled as FSA, is likely to attract international criticism.

Faraj says that Turkish commanders have discouraged Isis from using their traditional tactics of extensive use of suicide bombers and car bombs at Afrin because this would make the Isis-Turkish cooperation too blatant.

He says that the FSA men are “professional in planning car-bomb attacks as they have experience before with Isis in Raqqa and Mosul”.

But he cites Turkish officers as discouraging such identifiable tactics, quoting one as telling an FSA group in training that “we leave the suicide attacks for the YPG and the PKK (Kurdistan Workers’ Party which carries on guerrilla warfare in Turkey), so that the world will be convinced that they are terrorists”.

Turkey has had an ambivalent relationship with jihadi groups since the start of the Syrian civil war in 2011. At first, it allowed foreign jihadi fighters and military supplies to cross into Syria, though this tolerance ebbed after the fall of Mosul in June 2014.

Nevertheless, Ankara made clear by its actions during the siege of the Kurdish city of Kobani that it would have preferred victory to go to Isis rather than the YPG.

As the YPG advanced after Kobani with the support of US air power, Turkey’s priority became to reverse the creation of a de facto Kurdish state in Syria under US military protection.

The US is in a particularly difficult position. It was the YPG who provided the ground troops who, backed by US air strikes, have defeated Isis in many battles.

Without them there would have been no victory over Isis as was claimed by President Trump in his State of the Union message. But the YPG is now facing some of the same Isis fighters in Afrin with whom it fought over the past four years. It will not look good if the US abandons its proven Kurdish allies because it does not want a confrontation with Turkey.

Such a confrontation could be just around the corner. Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan threatened at the weekend to expand the Turkish invasion to include the Arab town of Manbij, captured from Isis by the YPG in 2016 after a long siege. He said that the Americans “tell us, ‘Don’t come to Manbij.’ We will come to Manbij to handover these territories to their rightful owners.”

The fighting between Turks and Kurds and the growing confrontation between the US and Turkey are all in the interests of Isis. It does not have the strength to recover from its crushing defeats last year, but the opponents it faced then are now fighting other battles.

Eliminating the last pockets of Isis resistance is no longer their first priority. The YPG has been transferring units that were facing Isis in the far east of Syria to the west where they will face the Turks.

Turkey is not in a very strong position militarily almost three weeks after its invasion of Afrin. It can only win by bombing round the clock, and for this it will need Russian permission, which it probably will not get. If it is going to expand its attacks, it will need more combat soldiers and this will provide an opportunity for Isis to join in a new war.

The Turkish embassy in the UK has been approached for comment but had not responded by the time of publication.