Cold War era on Anabolics

The revival of Cold War is now more than into armed conflicts, proxy warfare of Syria showed a new - again - division of the world in USA and Russia.

But recently the Russian teams were outcasted of the Olympic Games of 2020 for the reason of Anabolics use. During the cold war, the arm races and arms control were a surfaced exposed point of duality between both blocs, USA and NATO and URSS and Warsaw. But behind the Iron Curtain, and it was a case done in USA too, the ran for the physical supperiority was very exploited too. Rocky IV was a very clear propaganda of USA over URSS. The evil Russian murdered an American fighter. during the preparation of Rocky, mr. Draco was into Isokynectical overlimited preparation with anabolics while Rocky used natural and healthy methods to strenghten his mind and body.

Nowadays, we are reviving the cold war, or Rocky IV, with the outcast of Russian athletes.

Each 4 years, both blocs developed anabolics, in the case for exemple of Methandrostenolone, and years later the transformation of Dianabol in Turinabol, with carbon connections changed for the substante couldn't be into one of the prohibited. In case of Anavar and Stanozolol during years, and later Trembolone or Boldenone, using animal anabolics.

For the use of peptides, the use of HGH elevated a lot the physical capability and later on the use of sexual stimmulantis to promote elevation of the testosterone in a less agressive or less prohibited form.

Relates of use pregnancy and abortion was common too.

2020 was a part of the global politics after the Syrian bombardment and the proxy war on Syria, to promote western sovereignty over global politics. Remember that olympic game was at the prime focus a military peaceful dispute between nations in Greece, and Cold War was the most perfect exemple of this dispute in history. The global agenda punished Russian Athletes for the Putin's politics in middle east and the projection of Russia through Africa and South America.

Russia and USA were always the countries that mostly medal during decades. Russian Athletes are greater in individual exercises that exploites more capabilities of strenght, like hammer throw and weith lifting.

What is most common in the last 3 olympic games is the growing of military athletes for each country. Military forces give the military rank to athletes and they operate at training and winning medals, to promote the country into a condition of social capability or military unarmed capability.

Russia banned from Tokyo Olympics and football World Cup

Wada hands Russia a four-year ban for doping offences

Individual athletes can still compete under a neutral banner

https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2019/dec/09/russia-banned-from-tokyo-olympics-and-football-world-cup

Russia has been handed a four-year ban from international sporting competition for a doping cover-up that means the country will not feature at the Tokyo Olympics next summer or the 2022 football World Cup in Qatar.

An emergency meeting of the World Anti-Doping Agency on Monday unanimously voted to exclude Russia and also prevent it from hosting or bidding to host any global tournaments. The ban was imposed by Wada’s executive committee after Russia was found to have tampered with laboratory data handed over to Wada as a condition for ending a previous three-year ban for state-sponsored doping.

While the decision was hailed by Wada as the “strongest possible” response, it was criticised by some campaigners for failing to go far enough. The Russian national anthem and flag will be absent from both Tokyo and Qatar, but under the terms of the sanction Russian athletes can still compete at international events under a ‘neutral banner’ if they are able to prove themselves to be clean.

This includes the possibility that a team which does not actually represent a nation competes at the football World Cup for the first time. Russia now has 21 days to appeal the verdict.

Announcing the sanction, the chief executive of Wada, Sir Craig Reedie, said: “For too long, Russian doping has detracted from clean sport. Russia was afforded every opportunity to get its house in order and rejoin the global anti-doping community for the good of its athletes and of the integrity of sport, but it chose instead to continue in its stance of deception and denial. As a result, the Wada ExCo has responded in the strongest possible terms, while protecting the rights of Russian athletes that can prove that they were not involved and did not benefit from these fraudulent acts.”

Criticisms of the decision came from inside Wada itself, with the organisation’s vice-president and a vocal critic of Russian doping, Linda Helleland, saying it fell short of the ultimate sanction of a blanket ban for Russia and its athletes.

“I’m not happy with the decision we made today. But this is as far as we could go,” Helleland said. “This is the biggest sports scandal the world has ever seen. I would expect now a full admission from the Russians and for them to apologise [for] all the pain athletes and sports fans have experienced.”

Travis Tygart, the chief executive of the United States Anti-Doping Agency, who had previously said anything but a ban on participation for any Russian athletes would be inadequate, said Wada’s decision proved the system was flawed. “To allow Russia to escape a complete ban is yet another devastating blow to clean athletes, the integrity of sport and the rule of law,” Tygart said. “And, in turn, the reaction by all those who value sport should be nothing short of a revolt against this broken system to force reform.”

Russia, for its part, also denounced the verdict. “The decisions from Wada repeat themselves and often they concern athletes who had already been penalised, let alone other issues”, said the prime minister, Dmitry Medvedev. “It certainly brings us back to the theme of this anti-Russian hysteria which is turning into a chronic disease. I think that organisations responsible for this – and I mean Russian organisations – for which this is their area of expertise, they need to think of a way to carefully insert an appeal a result of this kind of decision.”

An appeal, which will be heard by the Court of Arbitration for Sport and whose verdict will be final, was at the forefront of thinking for UK Anti-Doping. “This was the only possible outcome that the Wada ExCo could take to reassure athletes and the public and continue the task of seeking justice for those cheated by Russian athletes”, said UKad’s chief executive Nicole Sapstead.

“We know however that this is not necessarily the end of the matter. If Rusada choose to appeal this decision to Cas, this must be carried out with minimal delay, especially in light of the upcoming Olympic and Paralympic Games in Tokyo.”

Evidence of widespread Russian doping was first revealed by Wada four years ago with a report claiming that at least 643 positive tests had been hidden by authorities. That resulted in the suspension of the Russian Athletics Federation (Rusaf) and 111 individual athletes being banned from the 2016 games in Rio.

Last year Wada made the controversial decision to reinstate the Russian anti-doping agency on the condition that it complied with requests to share its laboratory results. Those results were subsequently found to have been tampered with, and led to renewed calls for punishment. “Flagrant manipulation” of the Moscow lab data was “an insult to the sporting movement worldwide”, the International Olympic Committee said last month.

The specific terms of Wada’s new sanction include a provision against Russia hosting or applying to host international sporting events. St Petersburg’s role as host city in next summer’s European football championships is not included in the ban as Uefa is not considered a ‘major event organisation’. A planned bid to host the 2027 Rugby World Cup, however, would likely be scrapped. As for the football World Cup, Fifa said it was in discussions with Wada “to clarify the extent of the decision”.